WhichPost Creator Audit

Creator Audit for Studybuddy AI (simulated) · 1 авг. – 12 сент. 2026 г. · Times in UTC

Simulated sample2 notes on the data

Rebook 4 creators. Pause 8 creators.

Give 13 more creators another test before deciding. Posts brought an estimated 191 paying user (likely 167 to 215) for 8 665 $ of spend: 45,32 $ each, against a break-even of 49,99 $, the revenue a paying user has brought so far.

  • 191

    paying user found from posts

    Likely 167 to 215

  • 4

    creators worth rebooking

    Out of 25 creators

  • 4 848 $

    of budget freed by pausing 8 creators

    Even on hopeful numbers, they cost more than 49,99 $ per paying user.

Your creators at a glance Simulated sample

Each dot is a creator. Further out means more paying users per 1,000 views; a bigger dot means more views. Grey dots with a red ring had mostly low-quality views.

  • Rebook
  • Test again
  • Mostly low-quality views

Point at a dot to see its numbers. Select it to jump to that creator.

Cost per paying user
45,32 $
Likely 40,37 $ to 51,73 $
Break-even: 49,99 $
Extra installs from posts
1 888
Likely 1 654 to 2 119
0,31 installs per 1,000 views
Revenue so far from posts
9 558 $
Likely 8 373 $ to 10 729 $
1,57 $ per 1,000 views · 1,1× the spend
Spend
8 665 $
Across 221 post and 6,1 млн views
25 creators

Decisions

What to do with each creator

Each creator's cost per paying user, compared with 49,99 $. The whole likely range decides, not just its middle.

Rebook

4 creators

Even on cautious numbers, a paying user cost less than 49,99 $.

Book them again on similar terms.

  1. @cramclub 8,53 $ each

    Likely 7,80 $ to 11,60 $ each

    42 paying users (31 to 46)

    Brought about 2 104 $ so far (1 548 $ to 2 302 $), 8,79 $ per 1,000 views

  2. @medschool.min 12,62 $ each

    Likely 11,65 $ to 17,28 $ each

    36 paying users (26 to 39)

    Brought about 1 800 $ so far (1 315 $ to 1 951 $), 4,91 $ per 1,000 views

  3. @lofi.lectures 11,57 $ each

    Likely 8,13 $ to 28,03 $ each

    14 paying users (6 to 19)

    Brought about 684 $ so far (283 $ to 975 $), 6,48 $ per 1,000 views

  4. @studywithlena 14,60 $ each

    Likely 11,63 $ to 25,50 $ each

    13 paying users (7 to 16)

    Brought about 649 $ so far (372 $ to 815 $), 5,14 $ per 1,000 views

Test again

13 creators

The likely range straddles 49,99 $.

Book one more round at a similar payout, then run the audit again.

  1. @readwithrio 17,40 $ each

    Likely 11,55 $ to 58,30 $ each

    15 paying users (4 to 22)

    Brought about 729 $ so far (218 $ to 1 099 $), 4,31 $ per 1,000 views

  2. @ib.revision 25,80 $ each

    Likely 19,83 $ to 50,76 $ each

    14 paying users (7 to 18)

    Brought about 709 $ so far (361 $ to 923 $), 2,91 $ per 1,000 views

  3. @flashcard.fern 12,41 $ each

    Likely 7,95 $ to 53,71 $ each

    13 paying users (3 to 20)

    Brought about 642 $ so far (148 $ to 1 002 $), 6,04 $ per 1,000 views

  4. @examseason 18,05 $ each

    Likely 12,33 $ to 52,79 $ each

    11 paying users (4 to 16)

    Brought about 557 $ so far (190 $ to 815 $), 4,15 $ per 1,000 views

  5. @sciencesnips 16,60 $ each

    Likely 11,11 $ to 71,30 $ each

    11 paying users (3 to 16)

    Brought about 548 $ so far (128 $ to 819 $), 4,52 $ per 1,000 views

  6. @quietdesk 64,43 $ each

    21,74 $ or more each

    5 paying users (0 to 16)

    Brought about 271 $ so far (0,00 $ to 804 $), 1,16 $ per 1,000 views

  7. @mathsmadesimple 103 $ each

    39,53 $ or more each

    4 paying users (0 to 11)

    Brought about 212 $ so far (0,00 $ to 551 $), 0,73 $ per 1,000 views

  8. @studytok.sam 76,42 $ each

    22,50 $ or more each

    4 paying users (0 to 13)

    Brought about 185 $ so far (0,00 $ to 629 $), 0,98 $ per 1,000 views

  9. @deskdiaries 37,51 $ each

    10,54 $ or more each

    2 paying users (0 to 7)

    Brought about 97,93 $ so far (0,00 $ to 349 $), 2,00 $ per 1,000 views

  10. @brainbreaks 16,87 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 9)

    Brought about 11,77 $ so far (0,00 $ to 435 $), 0,12 $ per 1,000 views

  11. @acadaily 11,94 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 7)

    Brought about 0,00 $ so far (0,00 $ to 344 $), 0,00 $ per 1,000 views

  12. @focusframes 18,68 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 4)

    Brought about 0,00 $ so far (0,00 $ to 215 $), 0,00 $ per 1,000 views

  13. @lecturehacks 11,27 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 4)

    Brought about 0,00 $ so far (0,00 $ to 186 $), 0,00 $ per 1,000 views

Pause

8 creators

Even on hopeful numbers, a paying user cost more than 49,99 $.

Stop new bookings for now.

  1. @gradgrind 201 $ each

    107 $ or more each

    3 paying users (0 to 6)

    Brought about 147 $ so far (0,00 $ to 277 $), 0,24 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  2. @revisionroom 581 $ each

    191 $ or more each

    2 paying users (0 to 6)

    Brought about 90,71 $ so far (0,00 $ to 276 $), 0,13 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  3. @pomodoro.pia 697 $ each

    140 $ or more each

    1 paying user (0 to 6)

    Brought about 57,83 $ so far (0,00 $ to 288 $), 0,11 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  4. @essaymode 458 $ each

    90,60 $ or more each

    1 paying user (0 to 5)

    Brought about 48,03 $ so far (0,00 $ to 243 $), 0,16 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  5. @notes.by.kai 80,18 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 2)

    Brought about 11,87 $ so far (0,00 $ to 105 $), 0,11 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  6. @campus.cuts 238 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 3)

    Brought about 0,00 $ so far (0,00 $ to 141 $), 0,00 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  7. @thestudypod 214 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 4)

    Brought about 0,00 $ so far (0,00 $ to 177 $), 0,00 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

  8. @unilifeclips 162 $ or more each

    Less than 1 paying user (0 to 2)

    Brought about 0,00 $ so far (0,00 $ to 110 $), 0,00 $ per 1,000 views

    Low-quality views on 100 % of posts

Evidence

The campaign, day by day

Grey bars are the installs you got each day. The line is what the model expects without the posts; the green area is the lift it credits to them.

  • Installs per day
  • Expected without posts
  • Estimated lift from posts
  • Posts went live

About 59 a day before the first post and 160 a day while posts were going live. The posts explain about 54 % of the installs in that period.

Posts went live01563111 авг.7 авг.13 авг.19 авг.25 авг.31 авг.6 сент.Posts went live01563111 авг.12 авг.23 авг.3 сент.
Daily totals in UTC. The model works hourly; days are shown for readability.

Details

Every creator

Sorted by estimated paying users. Code-confirmed counts are exact but incomplete: most viewers never type a code. Revenue so far is what their paying users have paid to date, after refunds; return on spend is that revenue divided by their payout.

Creators with their estimated paying users, cost and decision
CreatorDecisionPaying usersCost per paying userRevenue so farRevenue per 1,000 viewsReturn on spendSpendPostsViewsExtra installsCode-confirmed
@cramclub Rebook 42,131,0 to 46,0 8,53 $7,80 $ to 11,60 $ 2 104 $1 548 $ to 2 302 $8,79 $6,46 $ to 9,61 $5,9×4,3× to 6,4× 359 $ 7 239 490 416306 to 455 12
@medschool.min Rebook 36,026,3 to 39,0 12,62 $11,65 $ to 17,28 $ 1 800 $1 315 $ to 1 951 $4,91 $3,59 $ to 5,32 $4,0×2,9× to 4,3× 455 $ 6 366 754 356260 to 385 14
@readwithrio Test again 14,64,4 to 22,0 17,40 $11,55 $ to 58,30 $ 729 $218 $ to 1 099 $4,31 $1,29 $ to 6,49 $2,9×0,9× to 4,3× 254 $ 14 169 230 14443 to 217 5
@ib.revision Test again 14,27,2 to 18,5 25,80 $19,83 $ to 50,76 $ 709 $361 $ to 923 $2,91 $1,48 $ to 3,78 $1,9×1,0× to 2,5× 366 $ 9 244 038 14071 to 182 1
@lofi.lectures Rebook 13,75,7 to 19,5 11,57 $8,13 $ to 28,03 $ 684 $283 $ to 975 $6,48 $2,68 $ to 9,23 $4,3×1,8× to 6,2× 158 $ 7 105 640 13556 to 193 8
@studywithlena Rebook 13,07,4 to 16,3 14,60 $11,63 $ to 25,50 $ 649 $372 $ to 815 $5,14 $2,94 $ to 6,45 $3,4×2,0× to 4,3× 190 $ 7 126 438 12873 to 161 4
@flashcard.fern Test again 12,83,0 to 20,0 12,41 $7,95 $ to 53,71 $ 642 $148 $ to 1 002 $6,04 $1,40 $ to 9,43 $4,0×0,9× to 6,3× 159 $ 12 106 196 12729 to 198 2
@examseason Test again 11,13,8 to 16,3 18,05 $12,33 $ to 52,79 $ 557 $190 $ to 815 $4,15 $1,42 $ to 6,08 $2,8×0,9× to 4,1× 201 $ 9 134 082 11038 to 161 5
@sciencesnips Test again 11,02,6 to 16,4 16,60 $11,11 $ to 71,30 $ 548 $128 $ to 819 $4,52 $1,05 $ to 6,75 $3,0×0,7× to 4,5× 182 $ 10 121 316 10825 to 162 4
@quietdesk Test again 5,40,0 to 16,1 64,43 $21,74 $ or more 271 $0,00 $ to 804 $1,16 $0,00 $ to 3,45 $0,8×0,0× to 2,3× 350 $ 16 233 235 540 to 159 3
@mathsmadesimple Test again 4,20,0 to 11,0 103 $39,53 $ or more 212 $0,00 $ to 551 $0,73 $0,00 $ to 1,90 $0,5×0,0× to 1,3× 435 $ 13 290 201 420 to 109 1
@studytok.sam Test again 3,70,0 to 12,6 76,42 $22,50 $ or more 185 $0,00 $ to 629 $0,98 $0,00 $ to 3,33 $0,7×0,0× to 2,2× 283 $ 11 188 822 370 to 124 1
@gradgrind100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 2,90,0 to 5,5 201 $107 $ or more 147 $0,00 $ to 277 $0,24 $0,00 $ to 0,45 $0,2×0,0× to 0,5× 592 $ 6 618 871 290 to 55 0
@deskdiaries Test again 2,00,0 to 7,0 37,51 $10,54 $ or more 97,93 $0,00 $ to 349 $2,00 $0,00 $ to 7,12 $1,3×0,0× to 4,7× 73,49 $ 6 48 988 190 to 69 1
@revisionroom100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 1,80,0 to 5,5 581 $191 $ or more 90,71 $0,00 $ to 276 $0,13 $0,00 $ to 0,39 $0,1×0,0× to 0,3× 1 054 $ 11 710 207 180 to 55 0
@pomodoro.pia100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 1,20,0 to 5,8 697 $140 $ or more 57,83 $0,00 $ to 288 $0,11 $0,00 $ to 0,54 $0,1×0,0× to 0,4× 806 $ 8 537 208 110 to 57 0
@essaymode100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 1,00,0 to 4,9 458 $90,60 $ or more 48,03 $0,00 $ to 243 $0,16 $0,00 $ to 0,83 $0,1×0,0× to 0,6× 440 $ 7 293 341 90 to 48 0
@notes.by.kai100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 0,20,0 to 2,1 80,18 $ or more 11,87 $0,00 $ to 105 $0,11 $0,00 $ to 0,94 $0,1×0,0× to 0,6× 169 $ 3 112 741 20 to 21 0
@brainbreaks Test again 0,20,0 to 8,7 16,87 $ or more 11,77 $0,00 $ to 435 $0,12 $0,00 $ to 4,44 $0,1×0,0× to 3,0× 147 $ 8 97 823 20 to 86 1
@acadaily Test again 0,00,0 to 6,9 11,94 $ or more 0,00 $0,00 $ to 344 $0,00 $0,00 $ to 6,28 $0,0×0,0× to 4,2× 82,17 $ 14 54 781 00 to 68 1
@campus.cuts100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 0,00,0 to 2,8 238 $ or more 0,00 $0,00 $ to 141 $0,00 $0,00 $ to 0,31 $0,0×0,0× to 0,2× 671 $ 12 447 418 00 to 28 0
@focusframes Test again 0,00,0 to 4,3 18,68 $ or more 0,00 $0,00 $ to 215 $0,00 $0,00 $ to 4,01 $0,0×0,0× to 2,7× 80,52 $ 4 53 679 00 to 43 1
@lecturehacks Test again 0,00,0 to 3,7 11,27 $ or more 0,00 $0,00 $ to 186 $0,00 $0,00 $ to 6,65 $0,0×0,0× to 4,4× 41,91 $ 6 27 942 00 to 37 0
@thestudypod100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 0,00,0 to 3,5 214 $ or more 0,00 $0,00 $ to 177 $0,00 $0,00 $ to 0,35 $0,0×0,0× to 0,2× 761 $ 10 507 041 00 to 35 0
@unilifeclips100 % of posts look like low-quality views Pause 0,00,0 to 2,2 162 $ or more 0,00 $0,00 $ to 110 $0,00 $0,00 $ to 0,46 $0,0×0,0× to 0,3× 356 $ 5 237 299 00 to 22 0

Would a report like this help you decide which creators to rebook?

Top posts

The 15 posts with the most estimated installs. Single posts are rarely measurable on their own: “With creator” means the creator's estimate shared out by each post's views.

Posts with the most estimated installs
PostCreatorPosted (UTC)ViewsSpendExtra installsMeasuredView quality
clip0183 @medschool.min 21 авг., 21:00 263 699Tracked over time 300 $ 255,7186,7 to 277,0 On its own No problems found
clip0048 @cramclub 24 авг., 15:00 115 419Tracked over time 173 $ 200,4147,4 to 219,2 On its own No problems found
clip0045 @cramclub 1 сент., 12:00 67 877Tracked over time 102 $ 117,886,7 to 128,9 On its own No problems found
clip0006 @studywithlena 17 авг., 11:00 68 186Tracked over time 102 $ 69,239,6 to 86,8 On its own No problems found
clip0184 @medschool.min 30 авг., 02:00 68 154Tracked over time 102 $ 66,148,3 to 71,6 On its own No problems found
clip0043 @cramclub 15 авг., 04:00 35 927Tracked over time 53,89 $ 62,345,8 to 68,2 On its own No problems found
clip0179 @ib.revision 31 авг., 11:00 90 048Tracked over time 135 $ 51,726,3 to 67,3 On its own No problems found
clip0174 @ib.revision 23 авг., 13:00 83 764Tracked over time 126 $ 48,124,5 to 62,6 With creator No problems found
clip0038 @lofi.lectures 27 авг., 17:00 32 209Tracked over time 48,31 $ 41,217,0 to 58,7 With creator No problems found
clip0066 @flashcard.fern 27 авг., 08:00 31 670Tracked over time 47,51 $ 37,88,7 to 58,9 With creator No problems found
clip0036 @lofi.lectures 22 авг., 17:00 28 166Tracked over time 42,25 $ 36,114,9 to 51,3 With creator No problems found
clip0007 @studywithlena 20 авг., 12:00 34 899Tracked over time 52,35 $ 35,420,3 to 44,4 With creator No problems found
clip0110 @readwithrio 24 авг., 18:00 40 766Tracked over time 61,15 $ 34,610,3 to 52,2 With creator No problems found
clip0012 @examseason 25 авг., 07:00 41 254Tracked over time 61,88 $ 33,811,6 to 49,5 With creator No problems found
clip0198 @sciencesnips 23 авг., 18:00 37 679Tracked over time 56,52 $ 33,67,8 to 50,2 With creator No problems found

Results by market

Extra conversions in each country during the campaign, compared with the weeks before it. Small markets borrow strength from similar ones, so their numbers don't jump around with every sign-up. Counts are installs.

49 % of the extra conversions came from Соединенные Штаты.

All markets: 1 921 extra installs (likely 1 793 to 2 040).

No pooled data yet for Соединенные Штаты, Великобритания, Германия, Индия, Канада, Бразилия и Австралия; using your own data and the global model.

Ranges show where the true number most likely is; each is designed to contain it about 80 times in 100.

By country

By country
MarketBefore, per dayDuring, per dayExtraShare of the liftBecame payingBased on
Соединенные ШтатыUnited States 28,8 74,7 945859 to 1 030 49 %46 % to 52 % 10,2 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
ВеликобританияUK & Ireland 5,7 17,5 251220 to 281 13 %11 % to 15 % 11,4 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
ГерманияGermany, Austria & Switzerland 4,0 13,5 202177 to 227 11 %9 % to 12 % 8,2 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
ИндияIndia 7,6 16,3 170134 to 203 9 %7 % to 10 % 9,9 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
КанадаCanada 4,1 11,2 146122 to 170 8 %6 % to 9 % 9,0 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
БразилияBrazil 4,2 10,1 12196 to 144 6 %5 % to 7 % 11,4 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
АвстралияAustralia, New Zealand & Pacific 4,3 8,6 8560 to 106 4 %3 % to 5 % 10,1 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
By market group and region

By region

By region
MarketBefore, per dayDuring, per dayExtraShare of the liftBecame payingBased on
North America 32,9 86,0 1 0911 001 to 1 180 57 %54 % to 59 % 10,0 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
Europe 9,7 31,1 453412 to 493 24 %22 % to 26 % 10,0 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
Asia-Pacific 11,9 24,9 255210 to 295 13 %11 % to 15 % 10,0 % Your dataNo pooled data yet
Latin America & Caribbean 4,2 10,1 12196 to 144 6 %5 % to 7 % 11,4 % Your dataNo pooled data yet

Data

Notes on the data

  • 62 posts have views that look low quality (see the post table). Their creators' estimates already reflect it.

  • Sales without posts follow your customers' local time and public holidays in Соединенные Штаты, Индия, Великобритания, Австралия, Бразилия, Канада и Германия.

Accuracy check against the simulation's truth

This report was produced from simulated data with known answers. The true number of post-driven installs was 1 947; the estimate was 1 888 (likely 1 654 to 2 119). 92 % of creator ranges contain the true value (the target is about 80 %).

Method

How these numbers were made

Method, ranges and decision rules

These numbers come from statistical models WhichPost built and trained in-house, fitted to Studybuddy AI (simulated)'s own data.

Every hour's installs are split into what the product would have had anyway and what each creator's new views added.

Paying users are installs multiplied by 10,1 %. Share of installs that paid within 30 days (users old enough to have had the chance). Revenue per paying user so far: 49,99 $.

Revenue so far is what paying users have paid up to 12 сент. 2026 г., after refunds. The 383 customers who started paying since the first post have paid about 49,99 $ each so far (likely 49,99 $ to 49,99 $); a creator's revenue is their paying users times that, so it assumes their customers pay like other new customers. Revenue per 1,000 views and return on spend divide it by their views and payout.

Ranges are 80 % ranges, designed to contain the true value about 80 times in 100. Individual posts are rarely measurable on their own; post numbers marked “With creator” are the creator's estimate shared out by each post's views.

Decisions: rebook when even the cautious cost per paying user beats the target; pause when even the hopeful one misses it; test again when the range straddles it. No target was set, so the target is break-even: the revenue a paying user has brought so far (49,99 $).